LLM Hardware Decision Dashboard

Last updated: 2026-03-29 13:03 | Tests: 110 | Cost: $0.0000

66%
8GB
90%
16-32GB
83%
64GB
89%
128GB
91%
Cloud (ref)

Quality by RAM Tier (% of ideal)

8GB
66%
16-32GB
90%
64GB
83%
128GB
89%
Cloud (ref)
91%

Score Heatmap (Model x Task)

ModelInfrastructure Bug FixingSecurityERP IntegrationDatabase AdminiDocumentationShell / DevOpsContent (FrenchAnalysis / ReasClaude Code SpeAvg
Qwen 2.5 7B
8GB
91%76%90%100%91%92%100%100%57%70%87%
Qwen 3.5 9B
8GB
100%100%60%90%0%0%100%0%0%0%45%
Phi-4 14B
16-32GB
100%76%90%100%91%85%100%100%48%80%87%
Qwen3 Coder Next (3B active/80B)
16-32GB
91%100%100%90%100%100%100%100%65%90%94%
Qwen 2.5 72B
64GB
100%76%100%100%100%92%100%100%65%70%90%
DeepSeek V3.1
64GB
91%88%90%90%100%85%100%100%48%80%87%
Qwen 3.5 27B
64GB
100%100%90%90%100%0%100%0%57%90%73%
DeepSeek R1 671B
128GB
100%88%90%70%100%92%100%100%40%70%85%
Qwen3 Max
128GB
91%100%90%90%100%100%100%100%57%80%91%
DeepSeek V3.2
128GB
91%100%90%90%100%92%100%100%65%70%90%
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Cloud (ref)
100%100%80%80%100%92%100%100%65%90%91%

Model Ranking

#ModelTierAvg ScoreAvg Time
1Qwen3 Coder Next (3B active/80B)16-32GB94%23.6s
2Qwen3 Max128GB91%19.7s
3Claude Sonnet 4.6Cloud (ref)91%20.4s
4Qwen 2.5 72B64GB90%18.0s
5DeepSeek V3.2128GB90%44.4s
6Qwen 2.5 7B8GB87%13.8s
7Phi-4 14B16-32GB87%9.1s
8DeepSeek V3.164GB87%27.1s
9DeepSeek R1 671B128GB85%54.2s
10Qwen 3.5 27B64GB73%18.6s
11Qwen 3.5 9B8GB45%34.1s

Hardware Options Compared

\n\n\n\n\n
OptionRAMPrice (CAD)Best ModelsAvg Scorevs ClaudeVerdict
Proxmox Ollama (current)16GB CPU$0Qwen 2.5 7B66%73%Keep — 24/7 lightweight tasks
MacBook Pro 14" M5 Pro64GB~$4,300Qwen3 Coder 30B, Phi-4 14B90%99%Sweet spot — 90% quality, portable, private
MacBook Pro M5 Max128GB$8,350DeepSeek R1, Qwen3 Max89%98%Overkill alone — pair with rack instead
Framework Desktop Max+ 395128GB$3,759Same 128GB tier models89%98%Home rack — heavy inference, 405B capable
Claude Max (cloud)N/A$140/moClaude Sonnet 4.6 / Opus91%100%Irreplaceable — agent mode, MCP, 1M context

The Optimal Setup

Don't overspend on the laptop. Spend smart on laptop + rack.

PORTABLE
MacBook Pro 14"
M5 Pro — 64GB — 4TB
~$4,300
Private work: emails, translation, research, tab management, RAG — all local, no cloud. 32B models score 90%.
HOME RACK
Framework Desktop
Max+ 395 — 128GB
~$5,744
Heavy inference: 70B dedicated, 405B distributed (add 2nd node later). Access from anywhere via Tailscale.
CLOUD (KEEP)
Claude Max
Sonnet / Opus — 1M context
$140/mo
Irreplaceable: Claude Code, multi-file editing, agent mode, MCP, dev-agent. No local model can do this.
ComponentCostWhat It Does
MacBook Pro 14" M5 Pro 64GB 4TB$4,300Portable dev + private AI (emails, tabs, research, translation)
Framework Desktop 128GB + PSU/NVMe/Fan$3,759Home rack: 70B dedicated, 405B with 2nd node
MikroTik CRS812-DDQ switch$1,815400G switch — future-proof, shared across nodes
DeskPi T1 8U rack$170Compact 10" rack — fits desk or closet
Claude Max (annual)$1,680/yrAgent mode, Claude Code, MCP — not replaceable
TOTAL (Year 1)$11,724192GB total (64 portable + 128 rack) + Claude

Why NOT $8,350 on 128GB laptop alone:

  • 64GB laptop scores 90% — only 1% less than 128GB (89%)
  • $4,050 saved buys a 128GB rack node with money to spare
  • Rack runs 24/7 — agents, heartbeat, heavy inference even when laptop sleeps
  • Most private tasks (email, tabs, translation) need 7B-14B — runs on 24GB

What the agent handles locally on 64GB:

  • Read 40 Safari tabs → summarize → save to Obsidian → close them
  • Scan emails → classify → draft replies (7B, instant)
  • Translate documents FR/EN (7B-14B, fast)
  • Research topics → generate notes (32B, high quality)
  • Code assistance while offline (Qwen3 Coder, 94% score)

$8,350 Two Ways

Metric128GB MacBook alone64GB MacBook + Framework rack
Total cost$8,350$10,044 (+$1,694)
Total RAM128GB192GB (64+128)
405B capableNoYes (rack)
24/7 inference serverNo (laptop sleeps)Yes (rack always on)
Multi-user servingNoYes (Open WebUI on rack)
Portable quality89% (72B)90% (32B MoE)
Battery life~15h~18h (Pro chip)
ExpandableNoYes (add nodes)

Claude Code Features (Not Replaceable Locally)

FeatureClaude CodeLocal Model
Multi-file editingReads entire projectSingle file context
Tool use (Bash, Read, Write)NativeNot available
MCP integrationNativeRequires custom wrapper
Memory (CLAUDE.md, soul.md)Auto-loadedManual injection
Agent mode (dev-agent)Claude Agent SDKNot available
Context window1M tokens32K-128K typically
Specs conformity checkReads soul.md + specs.mdMust be prompted

Mobile + Desktop Combo Setups

Laptop = terminal + private local LLM for sensitive data. Desktop/Rack = heavy inference server at home. Connected via Tailscale from anywhere.

ComboLaptopDesktop/RackTotal (CAD)Local PrivateHeavy WorkRating
1. Budget Terminal + Power Rack MacBook Pro M5 Pro 64GB
$4,500
Framework 2-node 256GB
$7,518 + switch $1,815
$14,003 32B models (90%) 405B distributed Best value
2. Strong Laptop + Mid Rack MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB
$8,350
Framework 1-node 128GB
$3,759 + switch $1,815
$14,094 72B models (89%) Combined 256GB Most balanced
3. Strong Laptop + Power Rack MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB
$8,350
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 192GB
$6,299 + TB5 $180
$14,999 72B models 405B single node (fastest) Best performance
4. Budget Terminal + Max Rack MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
$3,500
Framework 4-node 512GB
$15,036 + switch $1,815
$20,576 32B models 1T models, multi-user Client demo machine
5. Cheapest That Works MacBook Pro M5 Pro 64GB
$4,500
Framework 1-node 128GB
$3,759 + 10G switch $210
$8,554 32B models 70B single node Minimum viable

Key Insight: Laptop vs Terminal

  • If you work with private client data — laptop needs at least 64GB (32B models run locally, no cloud)
  • If you travel/work from office — 128GB laptop means no dependency on home rack being reachable
  • If you're always home/office with good internet — 48GB laptop + powerful rack saves $4,000+
  • The 64GB "sweet spot": Our benchmark shows 16-32GB tier scored 90% — Qwen3 Coder Next runs on 16GB and beat 72B models. A 64GB laptop with smart model selection matches 128GB for most tasks.

Cluster Node Pricing (Scale-Up Path)

Start with 1 node, add more as needed. Switch is a one-time cost shared across all nodes.

Framework Desktop Max+ 395 — 128GB/node, Linux
ConfigTotal RAMModelsHardware (CAD)+ Switch + Rack
1 node128GB70B Q4$3,759$5,744
2 nodes256GB405B Q4 distributed$7,518$9,503
3 nodes384GB405B Q6$11,277$13,317
4 nodes512GB1T Q4, multi-user$15,036$17,076
Mac Studio M3 Ultra — 192GB/node, macOS, TB5 RDMA
ConfigTotal RAMModelsHardware (CAD)+ Switch + Rack
1 node192GB405B Q4 (single node!)$6,479$8,464
2 nodes384GB405B Q8$12,958$14,943
3 nodes576GB1T Q4$19,437$21,477
4 nodes768GB1T Q8, multi-user$25,916$27,956

Switch: MikroTik CRS812-DDQ — $1,295 USD (~$1,815 CAD) — 2x400G + 2x200G + 8x50G + 2x10G. Rack: DeskPi T1 8U ($170) or T2 12U ($225).

Platform Ranking

RankPlatformStrengthsWeaknessesBest For
1 Mac Studio (M3/M5 Ultra) TB5 RDMA (120Gbps, 50us)
800GB/s memory BW
256GB unified memory
Ultra quiet, low power
Scales linearly with nodes
Expensive ($12K+ for 256GB)
macOS only
Apple controls ecosystem
Not repairable
Best performance clusters
Production multi-user LLM
405B single node
2 Framework Desktop (Max+ 395) Ultra quiet (no GPU fans)
Energy efficient (~120W)
No thermal throttling
128GB unified, repairable
Linux (full control)
Expandable (add nodes)
25Gbps Ethernet max (no RDMA)
Multi-node degrades with TCP
256GB/s BW (vs 800 Mac)
Best value clusters
Linux-first workloads
Client demos (open source story)
3 NVIDIA GPU (RTX 5090/A100) Fastest raw inference
CUDA ecosystem
NVLink for multi-GPU
Loud, hot, power hungry
24GB VRAM per card (consumer)
80GB per card (datacenter $$$)
Thermal throttling common
Training workloads
Datacenter deployments
When speed > everything
4 Beelink/Mini PC (Ryzen Max+) Same chip as Framework
Pre-built (no assembly)
Dual 10GbE on some models
Not rack-mountable
Harder to cool in cluster
Less repairable
Fan noise varies
Single node use
Quick deployment
Budget builds

RDMA: The Game Changer

Without RDMA, adding cluster nodes makes LLM inference slower (Jeff Geerling: 4 Mac Studios over TCP = 15.2 t/s, worse than 1 node at 20.4 t/s). With TB5 RDMA: 31.9 t/s on 4 nodes — 2.1x faster. Framework clusters hit this TCP wall. Mac clusters scale linearly.

Sources: Jeff Geerling RDMA benchmark | Apple TN3205

Team Sizing Guide

How to size LLM infrastructure for teams sharing memory, models, and interfaces via Open WebUI.

Team SizeConcurrent RequestsMin RAMRecommended SetupModel TierEst. Cost (CAD)
Solo (1) 1 128GB 1x Framework node or MacBook M5 Max 70B dedicated $3,759 - $8,350
Small (2-5) 1-2 128GB 1x Framework/Mac Studio + Open WebUI 70B shared (queue requests) $5,744 - $8,464
Team (5-15) 3-5 256GB 2x nodes + Open WebUI + model routing 70B × 2 (load balanced)
or 405B shared
$9,503 - $14,943
Department (15-30) 5-10 384-512GB 3-4 nodes + load balancer + RBAC Multiple 70B concurrent
+ 405B for complex tasks
$13,317 - $21,477
Organization (30-50) 10-20 512GB-1TB 4-8 nodes + queue system + usage tracking Multiple models tiered
7B fast / 70B standard / 405B premium
$17,076 - $55,000

Shared Infrastructure Stack

ComponentPurposeCost
Open WebUIMulti-user chat interface, RBAC, per-user API keys, usage trackingFree (Docker)
OllamaModel serving, concurrent requests, model loading/unloadingFree
pgvector (shared memory)Team knowledge base, RAG, semantic search across projectsFree (PostgreSQL)
Cloudflare AccessZero-trust auth for remote access (email OTP)Free (50 users)
Model tieringRoute: quick → 7B, standard → 70B, premium → 405BConfig only
Budget controlsPer-user daily token limits, model access restrictionsOpen WebUI built-in

Subscription Replacement Calculator

Replace per-seat SaaS AI subscriptions with self-hosted infrastructure.

Task TypeSaaS Cost/user/moModel NeededRAM per userSelf-hosted Equivalent
Translation (FR/EN)$20-30 (DeepL Pro)7B (Qwen 2.5 7B)~2GBOllama + Open WebUI
Document drafting$20 (ChatGPT Plus)14B (Phi-4)~4GBOpen WebUI with templates
Email writing$30 (Copilot Pro)7B-14B~2GBOpen WebUI + custom prompts
Data analysis / Excel$30 (Copilot Pro)32B (Qwen 2.5 32B)~8GBOpen WebUI + file upload
Code assistance$19 (Copilot)32B (Qwen3 Coder)~8GBContinue.dev + Ollama
Meeting summaries$10 (Otter.ai)7B + Whisper~4GBWhisper + Ollama pipeline
Image generation$20 (Midjourney)Stable Diffusion / Flux~8GB VRAMComfyUI + GPU node

User Profiles by Role

RoleTypical TasksModel TierReplacesSaved/user/mo
DevelopersCode completion, debugging, refactoring, PR review, documentation32B-70B (Qwen3 Coder, DeepSeek)Copilot ($19) + ChatGPT ($20)$39
EngineersTechnical docs, calculations, specs, diagrams, research32B-70BCopilot Pro ($30) + ChatGPT ($20)$50
Admin StaffEmail drafting, translation FR/EN, meeting notes, scheduling7B-14B (lightweight, fast)ChatGPT ($20) + DeepL ($25)$45
AccountantsInvoice processing, data extraction, report generation, compliance Q&A14B-32BCopilot Pro ($30)$30
ManagersStrategy docs, presentations, market research, competitive analysis32B-70BChatGPT Plus ($20) + Perplexity ($20)$40

Open WebUI handles all roles — admin assigns model tiers per user group. Developers get 70B access, admin staff gets 7B-14B (faster, cheaper). All data stays on-premises.

ROI Example: 20-person team

ApproachMonthlyAnnual3-Year
SaaS subscriptions (20 × $50 avg)$1,000$12,000$36,000
Self-hosted (Framework 2-node + Open WebUI)$50 (electricity)$600$11,303*
Savings$950/mo$11,400$24,697

* Includes hardware ($9,503) + electricity ($1,800). Break-even: 10 months.

Scaling Rule of Thumb

  • 1 node per 5-8 concurrent users for 70B models
  • Add 128GB RAM per 5 users if running 70B concurrently
  • Queue system needed at 10+ concurrent — requests wait vs degrade
  • Separate "fast" and "deep" models — 7B for chat, 70B for coding, 405B by request
  • All data stays local — no cloud API calls for team members' prompts

Full ROI Analysis

Complete 3-year total cost of ownership including resale, tax, and revenue impact.

Costs

Year 1 (Hardware)
MacBook Pro 16" M5 Max 128GB 4TB$8,350
Framework Desktop 128GB + PSU/NVMe/Fan$3,759
MikroTik CRS812-DDQ switch$1,815
DeskPi T1 8U rack$170
Hardware subtotal$14,094
Ongoing (3 years)
AppleCare+ ($189+tax/yr)$651
Claude Max ($140/mo)$5,040
Electricity (rack 24/7 ~150W)$591
API/OpenRouter savings-$1,440
GROSS 3-YEAR COST$18,936

Returns

Resale Value (after 3 years)
MacBook Pro (75% retention)-$6,263
Framework Desktop (40%)-$1,504
Switch (60%)-$1,089
Resale subtotal-$8,856
Tax Benefits (incorporated)
Hardware deduction (26.5% rate)-$3,735
Operating expenses deduction-$1,665
Tax savings-$5,400
EFFECTIVE 3-YEAR COST$4,680
Effective monthly cost$130/mo

Revenue Impact

Time saved per day
2h
No cloud waiting, private local AI,
agent handles routine tasks
Annual value at $150/hr
$72K
240 working days × 2h × $150
Even at 10% utilization
$7.2K/yr
Setup pays for itself in 8 months
KPIMacBook Pro 16" M5 Max 128GBFramework Desktop 128GB (rack)
LLM inference speed (32B)25-35 t/s (Metal GPU)15-20 t/s (CPU + iGPU)
Memory bandwidth546 GB/s256 GB/s
TB5 clusteringYes — RDMA 120GbpsNo — Ethernet 25Gbps max
SSD speed (model loading)7.4 GB/s (70B loads in 6s)~5 GB/s (NVMe Gen4)
Battery life15-18hN/A (always on)
Noise under loadFan audible on 70BNear silent
Power consumption30-100W120W sustained
Repairability0/10 (all soldered)10/10 (everything swappable)
Resale value (3yr)75% ($6,263 back)40% ($1,504 back)
AppleCare+$217/yr (holds resale value)N/A (self-repair)
Warranty coverageAppleCare+ until canceled3yr Framework warranty
24/7 availabilityNo (laptop sleeps)Yes (rack always on)
Multi-user servingNo (personal device)Yes (Open WebUI + RBAC)
ExpandableNo (sealed)Yes (add nodes)
Linux nativeAsahi (limited)Full Linux support
Private data (offline)72B local, no network neededNeeds laptop to access
Client demoGood (portable)Impressive (rack with dashboard)

Bottom Line

  • Effective cost: $130/mo for the entire setup (after resale + tax deduction)
  • Less than a Claude Max subscription — and you get 256GB of local compute
  • One client win ($5K-50K engagement from a self-hosted LLM demo) pays for everything
  • AppleCare+ at $189/yr is non-negotiable — it preserves the 75% resale value that makes the ROI work
  • The laptop and rack complement each other — portable private AI + always-on heavy inference. Neither alone is optimal.